Just because social media hasn’t been around for
centuries doesn’t mean it deserves all of Gladwell’s negative attributes. Why
can’t we see the new trend of social media activism for something a bit more
optimistic: an efficient way to recruit like-minded individuals for a greater
purpose and change? Then, once citizens’ ideologies unite towards a strong
social concern, those same citizens can willingly decide to individually move
forward and either attend smaller face-to-face meetings, sit-ins, protests, etc.
They can also simply choose to sit on their bums and watch the latest episode
of Real Housewives. The choice is
what is important.
I don’t see social media as a road bump to true
political and social change; rather, I see the decrease in motivational
advocacy among individual members as the true reason for immobility. I know many
people feel defeated before they fully learn or engage themselves in any
political action, especially among the younger generations, so why blame the
lack of action on current technological trends in media? Social media has an
opportunity right now to raise public awareness more than ever, facilitating
those who normally feel defeated and showing them how to take proper action at
the right time and the right place. Social media rapidly educates humans about
the inequalities in our world and guides them to make the necessary change
needed for tomorrow. This is where social media can be a blessing if
information is accurately understood.
Those who still take Gladwell’s side, can we at least
agree that access to social media raises awareness more efficiently than ever
before? For instance, look at what happened with the earthquake in Haiti in
2010. Did everyone who used Facebook or Twitter at the time see the impact the
earthquake had on the Haitian civilians? I’m willing to guess mostly yes. Did
everyone donate to the cause to help those suffering? No, but at least tens of
millions of dollars were donated by American citizens. Did the efforts, activist
groups, and donations completely reconstruct the villages and save every life?
No. Unfortunately, over seven years later close to 90,000 people still live in displacement
camps. But a dent was made and people across the world were made aware what
Haiti needed at the time. We had a goal, and social media made it accessible.
Is this system of activism flawed? Yes- it’s in a premature
state. Some, or arguably most, members of society (as I stated earlier) may use
social media daily but are not willing to ask how high when the headline tells
them to jump. Gladwell suggested viable activism requires passion, and not
everyone has enough to stay committed to a change. However, social media can
open minds of people who wouldn’t have come across information without it. And
for those who do possess some form of passion, maybe they will be challenged to
see the issue in a new light that forges a better path towards mobility.
No comments:
Post a Comment